Sequence Analysis

Primer Tm Calculator

Calculates the melting temperature (Tm) of a primer.

An example is loaded. Clicking the box clears it.

Examples
Reaction conditions
Presets

Sets all four boxes below. Where each number comes from is in the references.

Equivalent monovalent concentration used by the correction: 150 mM

Resuspension volume

Enter the nmol printed on the tube to get the volume that makes your stock.

Results — 2 sequences

Melting temperature for each sequence, with the values that go with it.
NameSequenceLengthGC%Tm (°C)Rough (Wallace)ΔH (kcal/mol)ΔS (cal/mol·K)MWε₂₆₀
FWD_GAPDHACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC2055.0%62.262-154.6-414.85991187,700
REV_GAPDHTCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA2055.0%63.062-152.2-406.66004176,600

These are predicted values. The real melting temperature depends on the sequence, the buffer and how it is measured, so confirm it experimentally when it matters.

SantaLucia (1998) nearest-neighbour parameters with the salt correction from the same paper, applied to ΔS. Mg²⁺ left over after the dNTPs chelate it is folded in as an equivalent monovalent concentration (von Ahsen 2001). The rough (Wallace) column is 2(A+T)+4(G+C), an eyeball figure for short primers — decide from the Tm column.

References

Where the equations in this tool come from. Every entry was checked against its PubMed or DOI record.

  1. SantaLucia J Jr. (1998) A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(4):1460–1465.doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1460The nearest-neighbour parameters and the salt correction — both of the things this tool uses come from this one paper
  2. von Ahsen N, Wittwer CT, Schütz E. (2001) Oligonucleotide melting temperatures under PCR conditions: nearest-neighbor corrections for Mg2+, deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations with comparison to alternative empirical formulas. Clin Chem 47(11):1956–1961.doi:10.1093/clinchem/47.11.1956The relation that turns Mg²⁺ and dNTP into an equivalent monovalent concentration
  3. von Ahsen N, Wittwer CT, Schütz E. (2011) Monovalent and divalent salt correction algorithms for Tm prediction — recommendations for Primer3 usage. Brief Bioinform 12(5):514–517.doi:10.1093/bib/bbq081The case for which monovalent and divalent corrections to combine
  4. Green MR, Sambrook J. (2019) Polymerase Chain Reaction. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2019(6):pdb.top095109.doi:10.1101/pdb.top095109The four values in the standard PCR preset — 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM Mg²⁺, 200 µM of each dNTP, 0.1–0.5 µM primer
  5. Wallace RB, Shaffer J, Murphy RF, Bonner J, Hirose T, Itakura K. (1979) Hybridization of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides to phi chi 174 DNA: the effect of single base pair mismatch. Nucleic Acids Res 6(11):3543–3557.doi:10.1093/nar/6.11.3543The 2(A+T) + 4(G+C) rule behind the rough column

The dinucleotide table behind the ε₂₆₀ column is not listed: its source could not be confirmed against a primary record. The molecular weight is a sum of base weights and needs no citation.

How to use it

  1. Put one primer per line, or several at once as FASTA. Dropping a file in works too.
  2. Set the oligo concentration and the salts. Na⁺, Mg²⁺ and dNTP all change the answer, and the defaults are a starting point rather than your buffer.
  3. Read the table. Every row shows what went into its own figure, so two primers can be compared without wondering which settings each one used.

Worth knowing

  • The model is SantaLucia (1998) nearest-neighbour parameters with the salt correction from the same paper, applied to ΔS. Magnesium left over after the dNTPs chelate it is what the correction uses.
  • These are predicted values. The real melting temperature depends on the sequence, the buffer and how it is measured, so confirm it experimentally when it matters.
  • Characters that are not A, C, G or T are removed and counted rather than silently dropped, because one missing letter changes every position after it.

Questions

The other sequence tools